Hello, I recently bought a 2nd display (24" LCD to complement my 19" CRT) and I've been trying out the UltraMon and DisplayFusion trials. It's not taboo to mention the competition is it?
So far I actually like DF better overall, it seems a lil' more polished... UM is more tweakable in some regards but most of it is common sense stuff that DF does by default, I like the way DF handles wallpaper much better (lots more options for randomization, etc, gotta do all that via a script on UM), and I like some of the extra windows positioning hotkeys... Though there's two mouse hotkeys in UM that I'd love to see in DF (move mouse to 2nd display and center mouse on-screen).
Anyway, I'm about to plunk down the cash for two DF licenses but there's just one thing that concerns me... DF seems to use more resources than UM, CPU utilization on UM is usually at 0% and it switches wallpapers pretty quickly, DF seems to take longer (doesn't really concern me) and I notice CPU utilization is always bouncing between 0% and 3%. I suppose it's not a big worry with today's quad cores and such, but I wanted to know if this is normal behavior or if there was something funky happening on my end...
What I describe only happens with the extended taskbar enabled so it's gotta be related to that I guess. For what its' worth, I think DF does use less RAM overall than UM (which runs three separate process if you use the script to switch wallpapers automatically).
I tried to do a bit of searching on the topic but came up empty...