Processing Ajax...

Title

Message

Confirm

Confirm

Confirm

Confirm

Are you sure you want to delete this item?

Confirm

Are you sure you want to delete this item?

Confirm

Are you sure?

User Image
Kevin K.
9 discussion posts
I used Sysinternals Process Monitor to monitor my system for ten seconds while not doing any window interaction at all. Much to my surprise, in that short amount of time DisplayFusion generated nearly 2,000 registry events. Is this normal? Are there any DisplayFusion features I can disable to reduce the number of registry operations?

(Win7 x64, DisplayFusion 3.4.1)
• Attachment [protected]: DisplayFusion-registry-events.zip [229,570 bytes]
Feb 10, 2012 (modified Feb 10, 2012)  • #1
Keith Lammers (BFS)'s profile on WallpaperFusion.com
It is "normal" in that it's expected, but we're actually going to review this again and see if we can optimize it a bit :)

Thanks!
Feb 13, 2012  • #2
User Image
Kevin K.
9 discussion posts
Quote:
It is "normal" in that it's expected, but we're actually going to review this again and see if we can optimize it a bit :)

Thanks!


Thanks. Let me know if I can help by providing any system information or doing any debugging steps.
Feb 13, 2012  • #3
Keith Lammers (BFS)'s profile on WallpaperFusion.com
Will do, thanks!
Feb 14, 2012  • #4
Keith Lammers (BFS)'s profile on WallpaperFusion.com
This should now be a bit better in DisplayFusion 3.5 Beta 7. There are still some registry checks and stuff that need to be done on a regular interval, but we've reduced the number or writes quite a bit.

Thanks!
Feb 28, 2012  • #5
User Image
Kevin K.
9 discussion posts
I downloaded the beta and tried it out. I noticed that while the writes are down quite a bit, the reads are still high, about 1700 total now.

But, my computer does seem less sluggish than usual, so maybe some of the other fixes I read in the changelog regarding CPU usage and such were more useful anyways :)
Feb 29, 2012  • #6
Keith Lammers (BFS)'s profile on WallpaperFusion.com
Awesome, yeah, we've made a lot of performance improvements in the latest beta versions. Please let me know if you run into any more trouble :)

Thanks!
Feb 29, 2012  • #7
User Image
James Hood
1 discussion post
It's been three years since this thread was started, but I discovered this exact issue when checking Process Monitor yesterday with 7.1.

Could we please get some sort of commitment to try to clean this up?
Mar 17, 2015  • #8
Keith Lammers (BFS)'s profile on WallpaperFusion.com
DisplayFusion needs to use the registry to store and read session data quickly and reliably across different processes. Even though Process Monitor is showing the registry queries, once the data is read in from the registry, it's cached in memory for quicker access. Are you running into an issue that's caused by this?
Mar 17, 2015  • #9
Subscribe to this discussion topic using RSS
Was this helpful?  Login to Vote(-)  Login to Vote(-)